[fedora-java] gnuxml -> xerces/xalan?
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Thu Feb 22 18:46:28 UTC 2007
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:14 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> And a slight problem with the alternative libraries is that at least for
> GPl applications xerces and/or xalan come under an incompatible license
> (GPLv3 will be compatible, but no applications use that yet). But we can
> try to make only non-GPL works based on these libraries use them I
> guess.
+1
That would be great if you all have reasons for getting xerces/xalan in
Fedora. We were going to ask for it anyway for the Fedora DocBook
toolchain.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20070222/88e34be5/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list