From obi at unixkiste.org Mon Jun 4 08:29:43 2007 From: obi at unixkiste.org (Stefan Held) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 10:29:43 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] JNI Libs best practice? Message-ID: <1180945783.3123.2.camel@workstation.unixkiste.local> Hi, in my current efforts for packaging Dbus-Java and libmatthew-java i have some jni libs to deploy. I've asked on #fedora-devel but got 3 different statements about the install directory for such libs. What is the current standard for this files? -- Stefan Held VI has only 2 Modes: obi unixkiste org The first one is for beeping all the time, IRCNet: Obi_Wan the second destroys the text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- perl -e'map{print pack c,($|++?1:13)+ord,select$,,$,,$,,$|}split//,ESEL.$/' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG-Keyprint = EAF2 6A65 D102 F2DB 4970 2A67 455B 98F2 572C 3FA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From david at zarb.org Mon Jun 4 08:33:19 2007 From: david at zarb.org (David Walluck) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:33:19 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] JNI Libs best practice? In-Reply-To: <1180945783.3123.2.camel@workstation.unixkiste.local> References: <1180945783.3123.2.camel@workstation.unixkiste.local> Message-ID: <4663CE4F.1050008@zarb.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Held wrote: > Hi, > > in my current efforts for packaging Dbus-Java and libmatthew-java i have > some jni libs to deploy. > > I've asked on #fedora-devel but got 3 different statements about the > install directory for such libs. > > What is the current standard for this files? As far as I know: Install the libs to %{_libdir}, but they should be unversioned. Install the jars to %{_jnidir}. - -- Sincerely, David Walluck -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGY85PN5thZBYlTwkRAjjhAJ46EpagzYm+VdLSLusphpbeL2hLawCdE68k wdLMK1+318OAaMp0W2BGhL0= =ef/y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mefoster at gmail.com Mon Jun 11 10:41:32 2007 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:41:32 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] Using jpackage 1.7 on Fedora 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If I enable jpackage 1.7 on a default install of Fedora 7 (with all the Java-development stuff enabled) and try a "yum update", several things fail. Here's the final output: --> Running transaction check ---> Package xml-commons.noarch 0:1.3.03-10jpp set to be updated ---> Package geronimo-specs-poms.noarch 0:1.1-4jpp set to be updated ---> Package lucene.noarch 0:1.9.1-1jpp set to be updated ---> Package jdom.i386 0:1.0-4jpp.1 set to be updated ---> Package geronimo-specs.noarch 0:1.1-4jpp set to be updated ---> Package avalon-framework.i386 0:4.1.4-2jpp.14.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package juddi.noarch 0:0.9-0.rc4.2jpp set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: lucene = 1.4.3-1jpp.18 for package: lucene-devel --> Processing Dependency: geronimo-specs = 1.0-0.M2.2jpp.12 for package: geronimo-specs-compat --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers is needed by package java-1.5.0-gcj Error: Missing Dependency: geronimo-specs = 1.0-0.M2.2jpp.12 is needed by package geronimo-specs-compat Error: Missing Dependency: lucene = 1.4.3-1jpp.18 is needed by package lucene-devel rebuild-security-providers is in the Fedora jpackage-utils and not the JPackage one (and the Jpackage developers indicate that this is possibly a bad judgement for the Fedora package); geronimo-specs-compat is a dependency of mysql-connector-java and, hence, jython and eclipse-pydev; while Fedora lucene got split a while back into lucene and lucene-devel and JPackage didn't follow suit. I tried working around this a bit, but especially the jpackage-utils dependency seems a bit annoying. (This may have to do with the current SRPM-as-noarch-RPM problem in the JPackage repository that means you need to --exclude things twice to get them really excluded.) Is the jpackage-utils thing something I should bugzilla at redhat? Should we worry about the rest of this? MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ -- Mary Ellen Foster http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ From bkonrath at redhat.com Thu Jun 14 09:12:53 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:12:53 +0900 Subject: [fedora-java] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library Message-ID: <1181812373.3375.1.camel@plug> Hi, Could someone re-start this stalled review?: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227500 Thanks, Ben From bkonrath at redhat.com Fri Jun 15 01:38:13 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:38:13 +0900 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse 3.3RC4 on F7 Message-ID: <1181871493.21154.7.camel@plug> Hi, I just whipped up some i386 test packages of Eclipse 3.3RC4 for F7. You can install these packages by adding this repo to /etc/yum.repo.d/ and then running 'yum --enablerepo=eclipse install eclipse-sdk': [eclipse] name=Eclipse 3.3 for F7 baseurl=http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/3.3-F7/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 These packages aren't officially supported but I would still like to know if you find any problems. Thanks, Ben From obi at unixkiste.org Fri Jun 15 09:19:13 2007 From: obi at unixkiste.org (Stefan Held) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:19:13 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse 3.3RC4 on F7 In-Reply-To: <1181871493.21154.7.camel@plug> References: <1181871493.21154.7.camel@plug> Message-ID: <1181899153.3374.6.camel@workstation.unixkiste.local> Am Freitag, den 15.06.2007, 10:38 +0900 schrieb Ben Konrath: > These packages aren't officially supported but I would still like to > know if you find any problems. Hi Ben, installing the sdk works without any problem. Starting it once works also. Before starting Eclipse: Mem: 1026520k total, 629856k used, 396664k free, 100268k buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 0k used, 2031608k free, 215832k cached After exiting Eclipse and Starting again: top - 11:13:28 up 9 min, 3 users, load average: 13.51, 5.72, 2.22 Tasks: 152 total, 1 running, 151 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.5%us, 1.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 10.8%id, 86.4%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.5%si, 0.0%st Mem: 1026520k total, 1014636k used, 11884k free, 720k buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 1030000k used, 1001608k free, 19064k cached This was really funny :) My System was very unresponsive. I have Eclipse SDK 3.3RC4 from Eclipse.org in my ~/ this runs normal, without these problems. Killing Eclipse with kill -9 resulted into the following: [sheld at workstation ~]$ eclipse /usr/bin/eclipse: line 6: 3581 Get?tet /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse --launcher.library /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86_1.0.0.v20070606/eclipse_1017a.so -startup /usr/share/eclipse/startup.jar ${1+"$@"} -- Stefan Held VI has only 2 Modes: obi unixkiste org The first one is for beeping all the time, FreeNode: foo_bar the second destroys the text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora Ambassador: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StefanHeld --------------------------------------------------------------------------- perl -e'map{print pack c,($|++?1:13)+ord,select$,,$,,$,,$|}split//,ESEL.$/' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG-Keyprint = 75C0 F029 CA71 F061 6C07 0640 38F7 E5F9 4EA5 A385 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From bkonrath at redhat.com Tue Jun 19 11:44:56 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:44:56 +0900 Subject: [fedora-java] Eclipse 3.3RC4 on F7 In-Reply-To: <1181899153.3374.6.camel@workstation.unixkiste.local> References: <1181871493.21154.7.camel@plug> <1181899153.3374.6.camel@workstation.unixkiste.local> Message-ID: <1182253496.13399.2.camel@plug> On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:19 +0200, Stefan Held wrote: > Am Freitag, den 15.06.2007, 10:38 +0900 schrieb Ben Konrath: > > > These packages aren't officially supported but I would still like to > > know if you find any problems. > > Hi Ben, installing the sdk works without any problem. > Starting it once works also. > > Before starting Eclipse: > > Mem: 1026520k total, 629856k used, 396664k free, 100268k buffers > Swap: 2031608k total, 0k used, 2031608k free, 215832k cached > > After exiting Eclipse and Starting again: > > top - 11:13:28 up 9 min, 3 users, load average: 13.51, 5.72, 2.22 > Tasks: 152 total, 1 running, 151 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 0.5%us, 1.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 10.8%id, 86.4%wa, 0.2%hi, 0.5%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 1026520k total, 1014636k used, 11884k free, 720k buffers > Swap: 2031608k total, 1030000k used, 1001608k free, 19064k cached > > > This was really funny :) My System was very unresponsive. Yeah, I've seen this with other versions of eclipse. Still not sure what's going on there. > I have Eclipse SDK 3.3RC4 from Eclipse.org in my ~/ this runs normal, > without these problems. Were you running Eclipse with GCJ in interpreted mode or were you using another JVM? > Killing Eclipse with kill -9 resulted into the following: > > [sheld at workstation ~]$ eclipse > /usr/bin/eclipse: line 6: 3581 > Get?tet /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse > --launcher.library /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.gtk.linux.x86_1.0.0.v20070606/eclipse_1017a.so -startup /usr/share/eclipse/startup.jar ${1+"$@"} I added 'exec' to the eclipse wrapper so it should exit more cleanly with the next version. Thanks for the input! Ben From alcapcom at gmail.com Fri Jun 29 09:00:56 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:00:56 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] New review: QuickREx eclipse plugin Message-ID: <4684CA48.8000501@gmail.com> Hi *, Yesterday I send QuickREx Eclipse plugin for review, the review is there -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138. I have based the specfile on the eclipse-mylar and the eclipse-changelog specfile. At this time, Bastian Bergerhoff (the upstream guy) don't provide a feature plugin but he would fix that for the next release. He will provide an archive with complete sources + the features plugins (I have send him that one that I have use to build the plugin). He was really happy to know that someone was working to packaging him plugin for a Linux distribution an thus was really open to fix some little trouble with the sources, a sympathetic guy. Some of you know that I'm working on the specfile plugin, please guys help me to review this plugin so that I can use this beautiful specfile plugin ;-) PS: I have disable jregex and jakarta-regexp API for the main reason that they was not Fedora package for both of them and that these functionality don't give anything more that the two other API (the JDK and ORO). Have a nice day, Alphonse -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: