From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Tue Jan 5 20:18:51 2010 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:18:51 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] xerces-j2 Update Message-ID: <9497e9991001051218w85f0689kf5e7437dcc4f102f@mail.gmail.com> Just an FYI because many, many packages use xerces-j2... I intend to update xerces-j2 from 2.7 to 2.9 (in Rawhide only) once the package review for xml-stylebook[1] is completed. Eclipse already expects version 2.9.0 (the OSGi manifest is currently lying to it) so I don't anticipate any problems in that area. Hopefully most other packages will be equally unaffected. Regards, Mat [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 -- Mat Booth From overholt at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 20:23:08 2010 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:23:08 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] xerces-j2 Update In-Reply-To: <9497e9991001051218w85f0689kf5e7437dcc4f102f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9497e9991001051218w85f0689kf5e7437dcc4f102f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100105202308.GH12482@redhat.com> > I intend to update xerces-j2 from 2.7 to 2.9 (in Rawhide only) once > the package review for xml-stylebook[1] is completed. Thanks, Mat! Andrew From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Jan 6 20:56:22 2010 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:56:22 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] Naming packages from apache.org Message-ID: <4B44F8F6.7030007@cora.nwra.com> crossposting to java and packaging - Seems like we need an accepted standard for naming packages from apache.org, particularly commons.apache.org. We already have lots of "jakarta-commons-*" packages, but now "commons" is an ex-jakarta project and jakarta.apache.org/commons redirects to commons.apache.org. Same with jakarta taglibs (although that moved to tomcat). As of now, the only apache-* package I know of is apache-ivy, which I would have named simply "ivy". I've got a package request in for "commons-jexl"[1], but it has been suggested that it be named apache-commons-jexl. If it were named that I would want a Provides: commons-jexl much like most jakarta-commons-* packages, so it doesn't really clean up the namespace any (just adds to it in fact). commons-* is a lousy name though too, be very generic. So, I'm fine with either (although I think it's quite possible that "apache commons" could get renamed again), but at this juncture before a bunch more packages come in from apache commons, I think we should make a decision and stick with it. 1 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion at cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com From mefoster at gmail.com Thu Jan 7 11:00:54 2010 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:00:54 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] Update on Soprano/Sesame progress -- review swaps? Message-ID: For anyone who's still interested in my project to get the Sesame backend for Sesame packaged, here's the latest... Unfortunately, I didn't get anything done over the holidays, but I'm now back and keen to move forwards on this. All of the required updates to existing Fedora packages have now been made, so the "only" thing left to do is the reviews of the new packages. The document at https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/c9/Sesame-Dependencies.pdf shows the current state of the package dependencies. In summary, the most urgent review at the moment is javamail and then, once that's done, logback, because the whole chain of aduna-* packages all depend (directly or indirectly) on logback. xml-security is another "leaf-node" package that could be done at any time, but it's not actually needed until all of the other stuff has been processed so it's less urgent. I'm willing to review any packages, particularly Java-based packages, in return for anyone who can review these packages. Once it gets to the aduna-* packages, the spec files are all nearly identical so hopefully they can be processed fairly efficiently. Best wishes, MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/ Interaction Lab -- http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/InteractionLab School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC000278 From overholt at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 19:32:10 2010 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:32:10 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] Naming packages from apache.org In-Reply-To: <4B44F8F6.7030007@cora.nwra.com> References: <4B44F8F6.7030007@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <20100107193210.GA1709@redhat.com> * Orion Poplawski [2010-01-06 16:02]: > before a bunch more packages come in from apache commons, I think we > should make a decision and stick with it. I vote for apache-commons-*. I also think a re-name with suitable Provides/Obsoletes is in order. Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Thu Jan 7 20:35:42 2010 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:35:42 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] Naming packages from apache.org In-Reply-To: <20100107193210.GA1709@redhat.com> References: <4B44F8F6.7030007@cora.nwra.com> <20100107193210.GA1709@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9991001071235o3e3c978drb36cddac82ef99c8@mail.gmail.com> 2010/1/7 Andrew Overholt : > * Orion Poplawski [2010-01-06 16:02]: >> before a bunch more packages come in from apache commons, I think we >> should make a decision and stick with it. > > I vote for apache-commons-*. ?I also think a re-name with suitable > Provides/Obsoletes is in order. > +1 I've had TODOs in my Jarkarta packages about this for a while now. -- Mat Booth From guymac at gmail.com Sun Jan 3 02:42:47 2010 From: guymac at gmail.com (Guy McArthur) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:42:47 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] eclipse problems on fedora Message-ID: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I want to use the Google Eclipse plugin for developing appengine stuff in fedora 12 x86_64 kde spin but have encountered serious problems getting this going. The straightforward way, downloading the whole platform from eclipse.org has a rendering bug. In the attached screenshot, the Google repository has been added, the items are there: text shows up when you click in the right areas, but nothing is shown or selectable. There are other weird problems with various controls including buttons and dropdowns. This is with both the latest openjdk and sunjdk. I don't know where in the stack (SWT, GTK, KDE/Qt, X, ATI radeon driver, SELinux?) the problem could be so am not sure where to file a bug report. With the other way, installing eclipse from fedora repositories via yum, I'm not sure how to add the Google plugin or any of its dependencies. What is the path of least resistance here? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: eclipsefail.png Type: image/png Size: 60891 bytes Desc: not available URL: From overholt at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 13:39:00 2010 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:39:00 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] eclipse problems on fedora In-Reply-To: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> References: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100108133900.GA2365@redhat.com> * Guy McArthur [2010-01-08 08:32]: > Hello, I want to use the Google Eclipse plugin for developing > appengine stuff in fedora 12 x86_64 kde spin but have encountered > serious problems getting this going. The straightforward way, > downloading the whole platform from eclipse.org has a rendering bug. Try exporting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=true and re-running. There are some SWT bugs on GTK 2.18. Query for GTK2.18 at bugs.eclipse.org and you'll find a few. We've backported a few fixes and made the above environment variable a default in our Eclipse packages in Fedora 12. > With the other way, installing eclipse from fedora repositories via > yum, I'm not sure how to add the Google plugin or any of its > dependencies. You do it the same way, using the update manager. The only sticking point is that the Galileo repository isn't there by default. It's easy to add, though. Just enter the URL as http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Fri Jan 8 13:50:38 2010 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:50:38 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] eclipse problems on fedora In-Reply-To: <20100108133900.GA2365@redhat.com> References: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> <20100108133900.GA2365@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9991001080550g2ca945e3pffdc3d86c05683d6@mail.gmail.com> 2010/1/8 Andrew Overholt : > * Guy McArthur [2010-01-08 08:32]: >> Hello, I want to use the Google Eclipse plugin for developing >> appengine stuff in fedora 12 x86_64 kde spin but have encountered >> serious problems getting this going. The straightforward way, >> downloading the whole platform from eclipse.org has a rendering bug. > > Try exporting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=true and re-running. ?There are some > SWT bugs on GTK 2.18. ?Query for GTK2.18 at bugs.eclipse.org and you'll > find a few. ?We've backported a few fixes and made the above environment > variable a default in our Eclipse packages in Fedora 12. > >> With the other way, installing eclipse from fedora repositories via >> yum, I'm not sure how to add the Google plugin or any of its >> dependencies. > > You do it the same way, using the update manager. ?The only sticking > point is that the Galileo repository isn't there by default. ?It's easy > to add, though. ?Just enter the URL as > http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo > What dependencies are we missing in Fedora for the Google Plugin? Presumably WTP at least. -- Mat Booth From overholt at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 13:56:20 2010 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:56:20 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] eclipse problems on fedora In-Reply-To: <9497e9991001080550g2ca945e3pffdc3d86c05683d6@mail.gmail.com> References: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> <20100108133900.GA2365@redhat.com> <9497e9991001080550g2ca945e3pffdc3d86c05683d6@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100108135620.GB2365@redhat.com> * Mat Booth [2010-01-08 08:50]: > 2010/1/8 Andrew Overholt : > > * Guy McArthur [2010-01-08 08:32]: > >> Hello, I want to use the Google Eclipse plugin for developing > >> appengine stuff in fedora 12 x86_64 kde spin but have encountered > >> serious problems getting this going. The straightforward way, > >> downloading the whole platform from eclipse.org has a rendering bug. > > > > Try exporting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=true and re-running. ?There are some > > SWT bugs on GTK 2.18. ?Query for GTK2.18 at bugs.eclipse.org and you'll > > find a few. ?We've backported a few fixes and made the above environment > > variable a default in our Eclipse packages in Fedora 12. > > > >> With the other way, installing eclipse from fedora repositories via > >> yum, I'm not sure how to add the Google plugin or any of its > >> dependencies. > > > > You do it the same way, using the update manager. ?The only sticking > > point is that the Galileo repository isn't there by default. ?It's easy > > to add, though. ?Just enter the URL as > > http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo > > > > What dependencies are we missing in Fedora for the Google Plugin? > Presumably WTP at least. Sorry, I don't know anything about said "Google Plugin". I know when people have tried to use the Android stuff in the past they've needed some component of WTP. Andrew From fedora at matbooth.co.uk Fri Jan 8 18:22:38 2010 From: fedora at matbooth.co.uk (Mat Booth) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:22:38 +0000 Subject: [fedora-java] eclipse problems on fedora In-Reply-To: <20100108135620.GB2365@redhat.com> References: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> <20100108133900.GA2365@redhat.com> <9497e9991001080550g2ca945e3pffdc3d86c05683d6@mail.gmail.com> <20100108135620.GB2365@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9497e9991001081022r257e822ewee74256723103898@mail.gmail.com> 2010/1/8 Andrew Overholt : > * Mat Booth [2010-01-08 08:50]: >> 2010/1/8 Andrew Overholt : >> > * Guy McArthur [2010-01-08 08:32]: >> >> Hello, I want to use the Google Eclipse plugin for developing >> >> appengine stuff in fedora 12 x86_64 kde spin but have encountered >> >> serious problems getting this going. The straightforward way, >> >> downloading the whole platform from eclipse.org has a rendering bug. >> > >> > Try exporting GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=true and re-running. ?There are some >> > SWT bugs on GTK 2.18. ?Query for GTK2.18 at bugs.eclipse.org and you'll >> > find a few. ?We've backported a few fixes and made the above environment >> > variable a default in our Eclipse packages in Fedora 12. >> > >> >> With the other way, installing eclipse from fedora repositories via >> >> yum, I'm not sure how to add the Google plugin or any of its >> >> dependencies. >> > >> > You do it the same way, using the update manager. ?The only sticking >> > point is that the Galileo repository isn't there by default. ?It's easy >> > to add, though. ?Just enter the URL as >> > http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo >> > >> >> What dependencies are we missing in Fedora for the Google Plugin? >> Presumably WTP at least. > > Sorry, I don't know anything about said "Google Plugin". ?I know when > people have tried to use the Android stuff in the past they've needed > some component of WTP. > > Andrew > Neither do I, and it's not obvious to me from the website[1] how to get the source. Is it open source? Just had a look back at RHBZ #486369 and it looks like the WTP effort has stalled for now. Just not enough hours in the day. :-( [1] http://code.google.com/eclipse/ -- Mat Booth From overholt at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 18:28:23 2010 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:28:23 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] eclipse problems on fedora In-Reply-To: <9497e9991001081022r257e822ewee74256723103898@mail.gmail.com> References: <5a8d5d151001021842u8162e69l8ff247d0c2740a42@mail.gmail.com> <20100108133900.GA2365@redhat.com> <9497e9991001080550g2ca945e3pffdc3d86c05683d6@mail.gmail.com> <20100108135620.GB2365@redhat.com> <9497e9991001081022r257e822ewee74256723103898@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20100108182823.GA6989@redhat.com> * Mat Booth [2010-01-08 13:22]: > Just had a look back at RHBZ #486369 and it looks like the WTP effort > has stalled for now. Just not enough hours in the day. :-( Yeah, I think you're right. I did get an SVN location set up for collaborative work but I don't think anyone ever committed anything to it :( Andrew From adam at spicenitz.org Fri Jan 8 19:23:26 2010 From: adam at spicenitz.org (Adam Goode) Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:23:26 -0500 Subject: [fedora-java] Update on Soprano/Sesame progress -- review swaps? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B47862E.5010107@spicenitz.org> On 01/07/2010 06:00 AM, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > For anyone who's still interested in my project to get the Sesame > backend for Sesame packaged, here's the latest... > > Unfortunately, I didn't get anything done over the holidays, but I'm > now back and keen to move forwards on this. All of the required > updates to existing Fedora packages have now been made, so the "only" > thing left to do is the reviews of the new packages. > > The document at > https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/c9/Sesame-Dependencies.pdf shows > the current state of the package dependencies. In summary, the most > urgent review at the moment is javamail and then, once that's done, > logback, because the whole chain of aduna-* packages all depend > (directly or indirectly) on logback. xml-security is another > "leaf-node" package that could be done at any time, but it's not > actually needed until all of the other stuff has been processed so > it's less urgent. > > I'm willing to review any packages, particularly Java-based packages, > in return for anyone who can review these packages. Once it gets to > the aduna-* packages, the spec files are all nearly identical so > hopefully they can be processed fairly efficiently. > I'm happy to review a package or 2 in exchange for jai-imageio-core: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536944 Adam -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: