From fedora_rh at terra.com.br Mon Sep 30 02:00:47 2002 From: fedora_rh at terra.com.br (Rodrigo Del C. Andrade) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:00:47 -0300 Subject: First date In-Reply-To: <20030929202642.GN30579@redhat.com> References: <20030929202642.GN30579@redhat.com> Message-ID: <3D97B04F.7090405@terra.com.br> There a details button??! Hell, if it were a poisonous snake I would be suffering right now.... Van Tammy Fox wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:34:37PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>So here comes my impressions on my first date with this Core >>thing: >> >> >> * I decided not to install all packages, then I found that I >>cannot select individual ones. So I tried adding packages from >>the add/remove program. Then I selected my packages, and tried >>to install them, when found that: > > > I was able to select individual packages during installation by > clicking the Details button. > > >> a) /dev/cdrom is pointed to /dev/hdc, this used to work >>on previous Red Hats, but this time I had to calibrate it to >>point to /dev/scd0. >> b) Even after that, the add/remove program cannot find >>the CD there, and keeps asking for CD. When I mount the CD, and >>press Ok in the dialog, I find it unmounted.. > > > I ran into the same problem, so I filed bug #105947. > > >> c) I even couldn't copy/paste the list of selected >>packages, so I wrote them down by hand, to feed them to up2date. >> >> >> * Then I proceeded with up2date, to install some new packages. >>Then I got the following weird error. Someone let me know if I'm >>getting faked packages? >> >>Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... >>######################################## >>apel-10.6-1.noarch.rpm: ########################## Done. >>The package apel-10.6-1 is not signed with a GPG signature. >>Aborting... >>Package apel-10.6-1 does not have a GPG signature. >> Aborting... >> >> >> * Bitstream-vera fonts are installed, but are not default. It >>was really hard to read the other fonts, after two months with >>vera fonts from Ximian. I took me a while to findout that they >>are installed, and are available under name Bitstream Vera, not >>Vera. >> >> * Many many places here and there, there are still Red Hat's, >>that should be replaced by Fedora equivalents. One funny example >>is the Login Screen chooser which has the thumbnail from Red Hat 9. >> >> * Cool thing, DRI works! >> >> * Nothing more yet. >> >>behdad >> >> >>-- >>fedora-devel-list mailing list >>fedora-devel-list at redhat.com >>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list at redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > >