2.6 kernel
Gene C.
czar at czarc.net
Tue Dec 16 18:28:09 UTC 2003
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 12:43, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:21, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:15:29AM -0500, Gene C. wrote:
> > > As I mentioned in a previous message, I was having problems installing
> > > the development tree because the LBA disk parameters were not
> > > recognized properly. Although I am willing to put up with a lots of
> > > stuff testing systems, I have no desire to just screw up my harddisks
> > > (even on a test system).
> >
> > Make sure you report this Bartlomiej. The 2.6 tree does a lot less with
> > geometry than 2.4. Andries took out a lot of the handling because the
> > kernel itself doesnt really care and the methods for playing guess the
> > bios mapping are heuristics at best and belong in tools like anaconda.
> >
> > I don't know if Anaconda has been taught to do disk geometry work in the
> > disk sizer yet or not
>
> parted has had no work done in this area that I know of. *sigh* :/
>
> Of course, with the little that it matters, it may well be irrelevant
> and I should just suppress the warning message.
To me it seemed to matter since it was not using the LBA values but the
"actual" (real) values of the device.
One system I tested on has two ide drives. hda is a 6.4GB Western Digital with
FC1 installed into a single partition and a swap partition. The popup
message said there was BIOS confusion and recommended rebooting with
hda=784,255,63. The second drive is an 18GB Western Digital which had been
"zeroized" in preparation for disposal (badblocks -t 0x00 -w /dev/hdb). No
popup for it but the numbers were unexpectedly large.
Now I know that Linux can handle native (non LBA) numbers OK and I even have a
Maxtor 80GB drive whose numbers got screwed up somehow and now I cannot get
it to be recognized with LBA values (and yet another 80GB Maxtor works just
fine with LBA).
Now I am perfectly willing to try anything with this system that has the 6.4GB
drive (even screw up the harddisks) since it is being prepared for disposal
(donation to charity). I am willing to undertake any testing you might want
me to try.
I am surprised that nobody has mentioned any problem like this yet.
--
Gene
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list