Fedora Core 2 wishlists
Chuck Mead
csm at lunar-linux.org
Mon Dec 8 17:46:59 UTC 2003
Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:04:18AM -0500, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:14:59AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>>>gnome 2.6
>>
>>While I don't want to discount this, I'd like to state here the
>>problem with it. GNOME is basically on a 6-month cycle. We are
>
> ...
>
>>So even if we were to pick up GNOME 2.6 this time, we would have
>>the same discussion every release until we bit the bullet.
>
>
> Apparantly I wasn't clear. GNOME 2.6 is not overruled -- I just
> wanted to have the arguments for both sides on the table. It is
> still very much an option worth discussing.
I am very much in favor of gnome 2.6 as well as inclusion of xfce!
--
csm
Lunar Project Leader
Disclaimer: "I am not a curmudgeon! No... really..."
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list