FC2 initial schedule posted

[Chris Funderburg]

Peter Jones wrote:

>On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 17:58, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>  
>
>>On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 16:47, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Due to the fact that I had mostly used a Sparc for many years.. (and had the old
>>>assembly books for it) I got to be the support technician for it. 
>>>      
>>>
>>And after Stephen, I was the support technician for RHL SPARC until it
>>end-of-lifed with 6.2, so I'm in full agreement with his points. :)
>>    
>>
>
>*cough*.  I think you've skipped a couple of years of history there ;)
>
>Of course, he's still right.
>
>  
>
<drifting off topic a bit>

Not that I'd want to put anyone off the idea, but I do then wonder, Why 
do it?

Why try to integrate it into Fedora when your efforts won't lead to 
profits for
Red Hat?

I understand it from a personal perspective.  It's a challenge.  It can 
make hardware
available that was otherwise lost to Sun.  It's Linux-From-Scratch in 
the extreme.

But at the same time, this is just our obsession.  It sort of looks like 
a bunch of geeks
(myself very much included) that don't know when to just give up and 
accept the Sun license
and everything that comes with it.  ;-)

</drifting off topic a bit>

<I now duck and start downloading Aurora for my sins>