[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: AMD 64 support



I wouldnt say that... people are working on an AMD64 fedora currently.  

Justin M. Forbes

On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Pete Bradbury wrote:

> So should I infer from what you are saying that the AMD 64 port is some way
> off in the distant future and that until Fedora on the '86 platform is
> stabilised work is unlikely to proceed for this new processor?
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Snitzer" <msnitzer lnxi com>
> To: <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:34 PM
> Subject: Re: AMD 64 support
> 
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 03 2003 at 10:42,
> > seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 12:41, Pete Bradbury wrote:
> > > > Will the fedora project support the AMD 64 processor?
> > > >
> > >
> > > please read through the mailing list archives.
> >
> > Given that there has only been a handfull of references to the future of
> > fedora with regard to amd64... that's a bit cold no?
> >
> > Unless I missed a really inciteful amd64 thread: Yum has support for
> > x86_64 (as of v2.0.4?).  It would appear there are a few people interested
> > in a Fedora Core port to x86_64 but there has been little formal
> > discussion on getting that ball rolling.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]