[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: AMD 64 support



On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 06:48, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Mike Snitzer wrote:

> >We may even want a new fedora-amd64-devel fedora redhat com
> >mailing list for the cause.  Actually it might be nice if a
> >fedora-<arch>-devel mailing list were created for each
> >architecture the Fedora community deems worthy.
> 
> Personally I'm on about 130 mailing lists.  I really don't need 
> another one.  People are too quick to create new mailing lists 
> nowadays unnecessarily.  All 3 existing fedora lists are for the 
> most part identical off topic clones of each other, and a new 
> list would probably just add a 4th clone list.  fedora-devel-list 
> is the best place to have these discussions and hit everyone in 
> one spot.  If the volume of per arch discussion really grows to 
> the size that it warrants another mailing list then that is 
> something to consider, but doing it prematurely is just 
> personally an annoyance at least to me.  Others may feel 
> differently of course.

FWIW, there already is a list for AMD64 discussion, though it seems to
get only a limited amount of traffic.

http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list

This was created for the "GinGin64" technology preview, which was a sort
of "alpha" prior to the Taroon beta for RHEL 3, but it could be used for
generic RHL/Fedora discussion for AMD64.

--Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        jeremyp pobox com      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]