Packages licenses
Xose Vazquez Perez
xose at wanadoo.es
Fri Nov 7 16:50:13 UTC 2003
Elliot Lee wrote:
> Having a flag like that is not likely, because some of the licenses may be
> fine but not formally OSI-approved, and because the system used to build
> the packages doesn't allow passing options such as -nocl.
>
> You're right that there are many duplicates that could use fixing. Once it
> is decided which license strings need to change, you can file patches in
> bugzilla for all the ones that obviously need changing (e.g. s/Freely
> distributable/Freely redistributable/i).
the worse is that there are packages with *wrong* 'License' tag: ex. db4
querida:~ $ rpm -q --qf '%{name}\t%{license}\n' db4
db4 GPL
/usr/share/doc/db4-4.0.14/LICENSE shows that it's BSD-alike
_All package maintainers_ *should check* 'License' tag!!
--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list