[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora-legacy agrees to enforce rpm upgrades? (was: Warren's Package Naming Proposal - Revision 1)



On Friday 07 November 2003 08:47, Axel Thimm wrote:
> While I personally support this scheme, I was under the impression
> that there were more people against enforcing rpm upgrades for
> minimally changes (e.g. fedora-legacy should only provide security
> related errata). Especially because RH itself did not issue errata
> for rpm despite the known problems.
>
> In fact, Warren, I believe we were the only two supporting rpm
> upgrades, so unless we are the only left subscribers of
> fedora-legacy, it is not yet an agreement of the whole list. ;)

I personally agreed to it, until somebody showed me clear evidence that 
it could/would break something.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating

Attachment: pgp00034.pgp
Description: signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]