[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fedora-legacy agrees to enforce rpm upgrades? (was: Warren's Package Naming Proposal - Revision 1)

On Friday 07 November 2003 12:06, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Make it 3 then...  I support Warren's suggestion.  Perhaps others
> will speak up too if it is something up for democratic vote.  If
> it's not up for democratic vote, hail Warren!

Well, I think right now I'd have the final say, but I do differ to 
warren on a lot of issues.  I'd have to dig up some old email, but 
there were some locking bugs and upgrade version issues that we wanted 
to solve with a single rpm version set across all the supported Legacy 
distros.  Fedora.us has done a lot of research on it so I've been told, 
and they haven't found any reason to not fix these nasty bugs.

So I'm going to be a bit totalitarian for a moment, and unless somebody 
can show me a really good reason to _not_ fix RPM across these release, 
then rpm will be upgraded.

Note, this is not an upgrade just to upgrade, we're fixing bugs here.

Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful?  Let others know:

Attachment: pgp00041.pgp
Description: signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]