fedora-legacy/Warren agrees to enforce rpm upgrades?

[Jesse Keating]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 08 November 2003 04:20, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Am I the only one that finds it questionable that assertions like
> these are simply being made?
>
> Even if the whole list and the world agrees postscriptum (which it
> doesn't), what kind of tacticts are these? There was clearly not a
> list agreement (set aside if there is need for one), so why present
> your opinion as the list's?
>
> Did I mention that it was agreed upon all fedora-lists to remove glibc
> from ALL distributions?

Alex, calm down.  It has been proposed, then modified slightly (which I 
forgot) by Warren, to just upgrade to the latest that rpm.org has to offer 
for each respective os.  There were reasons posted as well.  At the time, 
nobody seemed to oppose it.  Now there seems to be some opposition.  No 
need to get your feathers ruffled, we can discuss it once more.  We have 
until mid December to make some decisions.

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam		(www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/rR2z4v2HLvE71NURAo8PAJwPx8r5O8cuBG2hHj08mJwMTVoRsQCaAnFu
nJ3KRZkvTOg47Bdiq5yrrho=
=hKfN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list