TradeMarked Name --redhat-config-

[seth vidal]

On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 17:15, seth vidal wrote:
> > IMHO it is the same in all cases. It's about credit.  Whether you'd keep
> > the command line redhat-config-foo on a non RH system is a different 
> > matter altogether.
> 
> Right, but I'm not doing advertising for a corporation by having apache,
> or gnu or berkeley in the reqs.
> 
> I don't wear clothing with brand labels present, for a reason.

I'd like to add one more thing, it's not the end of the world to use
rhpl, but I do have some concerns over 1. where and how rhpl is
developed and 2. it's api stability.

-sv