[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Fedora / RH 9 iso's



I failed to check to checksum of the image. It was bad, as was my 9.0.
Thanks for the input. I will direct questions like this to fedora-list
group, but I am still confused, as if I plan to develop on this platform, I
need to install it it first, so I come to those with the most knowledge, but
it is done. Thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-devel-list-admin redhat com
[mailto:fedora-devel-list-admin redhat com]On Behalf Of Alan Cox
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 4:46 AM
To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Fedora / RH 9 iso's


> What would be the correct list? I thought this product was now 'community
> supported'!

Daft question - but is your burner failing on diskc 2 or failing every
alternate disk it burns ?


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.534 / Virus Database: 329 - Release Date: 10/31/2003

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.534 / Virus Database: 329 - Release Date: 10/31/2003




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]