TradeMarked Name --redhat-config-
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Sun Nov 9 19:47:54 UTC 2003
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 19:26, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > IMHO it is the same in all cases. It's about credit. Whether you'd keep
> > > the command line redhat-config-foo on a non RH system is a different
> > > matter altogether.
> >
> > Right, but I'm not doing advertising for a corporation by having apache,
> > or gnu or berkeley in the reqs.
>
> Actually Apache is a corporation. MySQL is a business, UC Berkeley pretty
> much is, sendmail is.
>
UC Berkeley is a school, just like duke - non-profit organizations,
Apache is Apache Software Foundation, I believe, and that's also a
non-profit.
Mysql and sendmail are business, You're entirely correct, but sendmail
was a program before it was a company-oriented one, iirc. and mysql has
already had trademark trouble.
But neither of those are companies that directly compete with red hat in
the distro field, I really would be curious about novell-config-foo
being included in red hat enterprise linux, or even in fedora core.
-sv
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list