Much faster? i18n? tls?
Ulrich Drepper
drepper at redhat.com
Tue Nov 11 03:27:40 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> I've already seen the thread on LKML with Linus which I assume
> solves this problem.
If any code needed that specific patch, make sure the author never
touches a keyboard again and rewrite the code. No production code
should ever be affected by that change in any noticeable way.
> Sure, but UTF-8 is not such a hard thing to handle.
Then do it.
> I would definitely do. I'm afraid the problem is not UTF-8
> itself, but other legacy multi-byte ones. I mean, may it be that
> special support for UTF-8 may be needed...
No legacy encoding is of any interest. If we add any special encoding
optimization this will be only and exclusively for UTF-8. It's the only
encoding one needs.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/sFcs2ijCOnn/RHQRAm+kAJ9NxvBrrhBd1OMSUH6VRz/mlPJ9RwCgnavR
/4sVH1KVdr8Xbyd+UIPWsTc=
=6TS5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list