[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FC2, 2.6 vs 2.4

Le mer 19/11/2003 à 18:07, Xose Vazquez Perez a écrit :

> > The right answer is to get 2.6.x to where it doesn't cause FC2 to be "a
> > lame distribution" by getting it tested and stabilized :-)
> lame distribution becase the kernel is lame. Today kernel TODO list is not
> very small.

And there is a gazillon new hardware that will only work correctly with
2.6. So wich kernel is lamer ? Depends on your usage.

Current 2.6 is more than good enough to end up in rawhide (speaking as
someone who uses 2.4 and 2.6 systems everyday). There is no way it can
get as good as you want it without further testing. (Remember, when most
kernel developers will have switched to 2.7 it'll be way to late to
complain. The window for polishing 2.6 is *now*)


Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]