xmms release number

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 23:36, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal at phy.duke.edu) said: 
> > I think what havoc was meaning that programs that are going to be
> > exposed to the user in the extras/alternatives/etc repositories should
> > be listed in a comps.xml file and ideally then r-c-p could handle that
> > part and list them nicely in those groups for the user.
> 
> Sure, but this is not necessarily meta-information in the package
> itself. Unless you just want to create rpm groups all over again.

I wasn't talking about meta-information in the package, I don't think
havoc was either.

And afaict the rpm groups weren't too widely used.

-sv