Kind request: Set release version to "10"

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:02:54PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:50:49 -0400 (EDT), Mike A. Harris wrote:
> 
> > Reading the thread, it is aparent to me that many people who read
> > it and responded, did not completely listen to the problem which
> > you are describing.  Numerous people completely misunderstood
> > what you are trying to say, or purposefully chose to not read
> > everything and attempt to understand it.  I read your emails
> > fairly carefully however and believe I understand you correctly.  
> 
> Interesting observation. But the solution you've come up is one that
> has been covered before. It's used by fedora.us, and Axel calls it a
> "kludge".

Please Michael, stop misquoting me, it has become a bad habit of
yours. While it definitely is a kludge, you (deliberately?) skip my
main concerns about this scheme being broken by all rpm versions up to
this January, making this idiom unsuitable for "Fedora Legacy".

You know the war 1870/71 between the German states and France was
triggered because the Prussian cancler deliberately misquoted
statements of the French king towards the Prussian king?

>   rh73 < rh80 < rh90 < 0.94 < 1
>   rh73 < rh80 < rh90 < 1
> 
> Whether you add something after the 0.94 (or 1), doesn't matter.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031007/cfba6dd6/attachment.sig>