Better packaging for older hardware?

[Paul Gear]

Mike A. Harris wrote:
> ...
>>
>>Not a complaint, but why did they/you move changelogs from the doc
>>directory into the RPM database?  It doesn't seem like a very necessary
>>thing...
> 
> 
> I/we did not and have not ever moved changelogs from doc
> directory to rpm database.  You misunderstand what an rpm 
> changelog is.
> ...
> The two changelogs are totally different in concept, and the rpm 
> spec file changelog has always existed in rpm and been stored in 
> the rpm database, and a given upstream program's changelog - if 
> one exists for a given piece of software has never been stored in 
> the rpm database.

OK - i am now enlightened.  Please forgive my ignorance.
-- 
Paul
http://paulgear.webhop.net

A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my email reply *below* the quoted text?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031019/4afc2ae8/attachment.sig>