Implicit/minimum buildrequires

[Wil Cooley]

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 18:11, Chris Adams wrote:

> One question: with Fedora, would anyone be interested in the changes
> I've had to make to get packages more portable (and, in my case, working
> on HPAQ Tru64 Unix)?  Most of the changes I made were spec file
> cleanups.

Often I've thought it would be really cool to have an up-to-date set of
OSS packages for AIX and Solaris; these kinds of clean-ups and someone
with the hardware and time to pay attention to them would be really
nice.  Currently many (most?) people install IBM's RPMs on AIX and
Sunfreewareorg's PKGs on Solaris; having a set that was consistent with
Fedora Linux would be a great boon.  OTOH, there are not doubt issues
between installing into /usr and /opt.

Wil
-- 
Wil Cooley                                 wcooley at nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting                        http://nakedape.cc
* * * * * *  Linux Services for Small Businesses  * * * * * *
*       Easy, reliable solutions for small businesses       *
*    Naked Ape Business Server http://nakedape.cc/r/sms     *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20030922/b9c2c185/attachment.sig>