SystemServices info

Nicolas Mailhot Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Mon Sep 29 17:35:54 UTC 2003


Le lun 29/09/2003 à 19:19, Havoc Pennington a écrit :
> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:09, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Sure. But java is not really legacy and I don't see how we can ever get
> > rid of the shell system adaptation layer for java apps (gcj may one day
> > be an answer, but will all bytecode java apps be ever replaced by
> > natively build ones ?). Even c++ apps like moz often start via a shell
> > script. I'd felt better about this new system if it catered to the needs
> > of shell wrappers (other than putting them in a legacy bin).
> 
> You're just talking terminology I think. If it runs LSB init scripts,
> maybe with extensions to do any additional stuff RH init scripts
> currently allow, then what other catering do you want?
> There's no way we'd ever be able to remove this support, so perhaps
> "legacy" is the wrong word. "Classic" ;-)

Well, as long as wrappers are supported normally you can call it
whatever you want;). I was afraid legacy = bitrot haven.

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20030929/f9aad43e/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list