Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3

[Carwyn Edwards]

Stephen Smoogen wrote:

>
>Ah.. the problem for us has come that we need a ton of diskless systems,
>but that many have to run different configurations that are out of step
>from a central image. I had hoped this would be the exception rather
>than the rule, but it has become more of the rule than anyone expected
>(and seems to be the rule at other similar organizations.)
>  
>

There's some high level discussion on things related to this here:

http://www.gridweaver.org/

.. a high level look at the different large scale configuration systems 
out there with a view to what's needed going forward to managing Grid 
systems. There are case studies for a number of existing large scale 
installations in there ranging from 120 nodes to 1100.

Carwyn