fedora-startqa

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le sam, 03/04/2004 à 06:29 -0500, Toshio a écrit :

> On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 18:15, Erik LaBianca wrote:
> > XML Output is a great idea IMO. We can define a schema for a review, and
> > then use xslt to generate the actual review. We should all be able to
> > easily agree on the xml schema, and for those that love to tweak they
> > can always change the output template. 
> > 
> > In all reality, there may be a certain amount of benefit to actually
> > posting the review in XML. It's obviously the easiest way of making the
> > reviews computer parseable.
> > 
> If we get to the point of having tools within which you can write a
> complete review, we could have the tools post an xml review as an
> attachment and a human formatted review as the attachment's comments. 

Just make the review the xml file and provide an xslt stylesheet which
converts it to something pretty.

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040403/1ceab4d8/attachment.sig>