OpenOffice.org Dictionaries
M. Fioretti
m.fioretti at inwind.it
Sat Apr 10 12:33:04 UTC 2004
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 15:11:49 PM +0300, Razvan Corneliu C.R. d3vi1 VILT (razvan.vilt at linux360.ro) wrote:
> > Please no, keep them separated. In addition to the reason you mention,
> > saving space on disk is never a bad idea.
> >
> He meant Source RPM as in .src.rpm or .srpm
> Just like for other packages the binaries can be split. kernel is also
> only one __SOURCE__ package but multiple binaries
> (i386/i586/i686/docs/source)
>
> Haveing a single source package is a better sollution because you can
> have a consistent way of patching things, and only one spec file.
>
> My vote goes for "1 source package" and "1 binary package for each
> language".
Agreed 100%. I was referring only to .rpm for end users interested in
only one language.
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
--
Marco Fioretti m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it
Red Hat for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/en/
Preserve the old, but know the new.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list