xscale port of fedora core 2

[Lennert Buytenhek]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:01:21AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:

> >Yeah.  There are lots of strange things to be found in userland.  Like
> >openssl assuming that linux-elf == i386, for example.
> >
> >OK, so how do I go from here?  Should I just submit all my patches to
> >bugzilla and wait?
> 
> - File against each component in product "Fedora Core".

OK, my binutils patch just got rejected because "Fedora Core 2 isn't
ported to the ARM."

I guess I should have submitted it to 'devel' or 'test1' instead of
to '2', hmm?


> - At the beginning of each Summary line say [PATCH] so it is really 
> obvious that you are supplying a solution.
> - Add Keywords EASYFIX and PATCH to each report.
> - It would really help if you could also contact the upstream 
> development team with your patch, as it makes it easier to maintain in 
> the long run for all parties if upstream gets the fix for the next release.

Thank you, this was and is useful advice.

Five submitted so far:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129601 (binutils)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129607 (gcc)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129034 (rpm)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129587 (redhat-rpm-config)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129589 (openssl)


cheers,
Lennert