FreeTDS
Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens
ssc at coolspot.de
Tue Dec 21 14:53:51 UTC 2004
Ok, that would mean (for example)
main package ships *only* libct.so.2.0.0, nothing more
and the devel package would ship the symlink libct.so to libct.so.2.0.0
After one compiled e.g. php, php *knows* it needs libct.so.2.0.0 and
therefore doesn't need the symlink to libct.so anymore, and the devel
could be whiped away after all.
Am I right ?
Michael Schwendt schrieb:
>On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:33:26 +0100, Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ok.
>>I first thought it was about *all* .so files.
>>But why don't the symlinks don't belong into main ?
>>Don't they need to be there for versioning ?
>>
>>
>
>What kind of "versioning"?
>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-December/msg00705.html
>
>
>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list