svn or arch

[Kyrre Ness Sjobak]

tor, 16.12.2004 kl. 20.48 skrev Neal D. Becker:
> seth vidal wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 10:21 -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> 
> >> > Yes - Cristian Gafton did months of extensive
> >> > testing to see if either
> >> > could stand up to the load of internal and external
> >> > checkins on the
> >> > scale red hat does with distributions.
> >> > 
> >> > He found that cvs was the only one to stand up to
> >> > the load.
> >> 
> >> Ok thanks for the quick reply. are the results
> >> available anywhere. It would be nice to let the
> >> svn/arch developers know about this. I am pretty sure
> >> they would be interested
> > 
> > You can ask - but i'm not sure they are.
> > 
> > I know of them anecdotally - However, from what I know of Gafton he had
> > good reason for saying what he said.
> > 
> > -sv
> > 
> > 
> 
> You might want to look at darcs.  This one looks the most promising, in it's
> design.  Only disadvantage, it's written in Haskell.

In WHAT?