Choice of default fonts in webrowsers

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le jeudi 16 décembre 2004 à 14:11 -0800, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Hi
> 
> 
> > 
> > Why is it so? Why is those fonts, which it seem like
> > "everyone" thinks
> > are really ugly are used, when better fonts are
> > shipped?
> 
> 
> I have heard before that this is because the default
> fonts should be internationalised or something like
> that which bitstream fonts arent

It might be worth taking a new look now that the deja variant of vera is
announcing new glyphs every other months. Of course we're far from full
unicode coverage, but fontconfig will fall back on Luxi if needed, so...

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20041216/58df0524/attachment.sig>