svn or arch

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:46:53PM -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I suspect we would end up with something like conary
> if we design a build system on top of arch.

Interesting. Any plans for RedHat/Fedora to switch to Conary?
One difference between this proposal and conary is that we would
try to remain compatible with a .rpm based system. In other
words, the output of our system would be regular .src.rpm's
that could be built/installed/etc. by existing tools.

But the question is if it's worth pursuing this. If Fedora intends
to use conary in the (near) future, puting up with the CVS-based
system may be the smartest thing to do.

-- 
Dimi.