not SVN? (was: An introduction of the new cheerleader...)

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 18:10 +0100, Pau Aliagas wrote:
[snip]

> I'd definately go for arch. It supports signed archives, repository
> integrity checks, distributed development, easy branching, no special
> server needed (ftp, sftp, http and webdav would do).
> 
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1266

A guinea pig for my package!

Thanks,

- Michel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040211/8a73d9c1/attachment.sig>