Very OT: The Most Important Question

[Doug Stewart]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Oliver John Tibi wrote:
| Dear Mike,
|
| I think Chris was referring to "whoever was selling Fedora goods", and
not "whoever sells Red Hat products as Fedora goods". The term "Red Hat"
was properly used as consumer identification. And besides, we all need
to change our "look and feel", right? I sure could use a new blue Fedora
baseball cap (or others might like a blue "Fedora" fedora)!
|
| And yes, who IS in charge of the merchandise? It's so nice to have one
of them!
|
| Thanks,
| O.J.
|   ----- Original Message -----
|   From: Mike A. Harris<mailto:mharris at redhat.com>
|   To: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com<mailto:fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>
|   Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:47 PM
|   Subject: Re: Very OT: The Most Important Question
|
|
|   On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Chris Gray wrote:
|
|   >So, when do we get to buy new Fedora baseball caps like the wicked
black
|   >low-profile Shadowman caps that Redhat sells? And what manner of
Open Source
|   >project doesn't have cool t-shirts?
|   >
|   >Who's in charge of procuring and selling schwag?
|
|   Red Hat.
|
|   >I will volunteer if the job isn't already filled. Seriously.
|
|   The Red Hat Shadowman logo is trademarked by Red Hat, please
|   review the Red Hat trademark usage guidelines located at:
|
|
http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines.html<http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines.html>
|
|   I believe it would probably be in violation of acceptable use of
|   the Red Hat trademark guidlines, however I am not a lawyer, and
|   so I do not speak authoritatively of course.
|
|   You'd have to consult with your own attourney to determine wether
|   such usage of Red Hat trademarks would be ok or not.
|
|   Not really on topic for this mailing list however.
|
|
|   --
|   Mike A. Harris
ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris<ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris>
|   OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat
|
|
|   --
|   fedora-devel-list mailing list
|   fedora-devel-list at redhat.com<mailto:fedora-devel-list at redhat.com>
|
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list<http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>
|

I like the idea of Fedora merchandise, but first, don't we need to have
an official logo?  In that department, Fedora is sadly lacking...

And, to keep this on topic, is there a fedora-artwork*.rpm underway,
with "official" Fedora logo swag?  If not, where do I submit the
bugzilla RFE?  *grin*

- --
- ----------
Doug Stewart
Systems Administrator/Web Applications Developer
Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAMhkkN50Q8DVvcvkRAqWyAJ9/Av1vuokEFkXovl3Y9mW2G7SkkwCdFpcX
kn4ooh6x4uSul6JWUsXzcco=
=06bC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----