User Linux (quick clarification)

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:19 +0000, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:31:33AM -0500 or thereabouts, Alan Cox wrote:
> > <opinion owner="me">
> > As to unequal partnerships well
> > 1.	Last time I checked RH employees got told to do things like fix
> > 	packages they hate and turn up in the office, or actually do
> > 	work. Fedora.us contributors don't seem to. So I fail to see
> > 	the connection.
> 
> Before anyone thinks he meant "Fedora.us contributors don't actually
> do work or fix packages", I shall clarify.
> 
> He meant "don't get told to". (ie they do do stuff, they just don't
> get told to do this one first or that one now)
> 
Precisely why I think Fedora is a great idea. More community input but
with enough wage earners to fix things that volunteers cannot be
bothered to do :)

- Michel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040203/d9b846be/attachment.sig>