Closing bugs UPSTREAM

Mark McLoughlin markmc at redhat.com
Sun Feb 22 19:05:53 UTC 2004


Hi,

On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 14:07, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Marc,

	Its Mark.

> > 	I'm trying to figure out what you think doing it this way would achieve
> > ... I may be missing something here, you know :-)
> 
> Closing bugs as UPSTREAM is ambiguous if you close both bugs that are
> fixed and not yet fixed upstream.

	I don't understand. Why is it ambiguous? Why does it matter?

Thanks,
Mark.





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list