EOLed products and CURRENTRELEASE

[Bart Martens]

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 17:28, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> > > Would anybody object to closing bugs in EOLed products (currently
> > > RHL < 9) that are fixed in FC1 as CURRENTRELEASE?
> > 
> > That should be ok,
> 
> How about the case where the product is RHL 9?

Good question. Rh9 will be end of life soon. So some bugs may fall into
the scope of Fedora Legacy soon. Maybe it's a good idea to already mark
these bugs for Fedora Legacy, if a solution and/or an update is not to
be expected before the end of life.
http://www.fedoralegacy.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040226/c7226e15/attachment.sig>