QA process was Re: RPM submission procedure
Michael Schwendt
ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Fri Jan 9 02:22:08 UTC 2004
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:56:40 -0600, Timothy John Giese wrote:
> On the other hand, I feel deterred from reviewing packages. I am new,
> so I am not a "trusted" developer. In order for a package to be
> published, it must be approved by 1 trusted developer or 2 untrusted
> developers.
I think it's "OR": 2 untrusted developers OR 1 trusted developer.
> Given the large number of packages and the relatively few
> number of reviewers, I feel that my review provides little help in
> speeding the overall publication of a package (because I suspect other
> untrusted developers are also deterred).
We're missing a keyword (or a marker in the summary field) that flags
package request tickets which have at least one publish vote. Right now,
your best bet is to sort by "last changed" and visit recently changed
tickets.
--
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list