RPM spec in tar file (was Re: An introduction of the new cheerleader...)
Rui Miguel Seabra
rms at 1407.org
Tue Jan 27 19:21:46 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:19, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> Works fine. But the problem comes when Fedora wants one spec and
> Mandrake wants another. As far as I can tell, if the developer provides
> specs, it is presently not really possible to be distribution agnostic,
> or even responsive to the various distributions, because they ofetn
> conflict.
Then tough luck. Unless distributions agree on a package naming
convention, your SOL.
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040127/c3dadac1/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list