sylpheed (and inclusions)
Vincent
pros-n-cons at bak.rr.com
Thu Jan 29 05:21:52 UTC 2004
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:32:09 -0500
Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> Michael Schwendt (ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de) said:
> > Though, unfortunately, it's built without GPG support due to lack of GPGME
> > packages in Fedora Core.
>
> So, looking at this:
>
> Good points:
> - actually used by a couple of apps in the distro (potentially)
> Bad points:
> - GPL library
> - apps require the unstable development version
>
> IMO, things like sylpheed, balsa, etc. all eventually should
> probably be in Extras. But I may be in the minority. :)
>
> Bill
>
>
Using Mutt you probably don't notice, but try using evolution (or any other GUI e-mail client) for this list and It's painfully obvious sylpheed is the only option we have. Evolution crawls on high volume lists such as this.
I hope it stays put for now.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list