include much needed antivirus products in FC2
Chris Ricker
kaboom at gatech.edu
Tue Jan 6 20:56:51 UTC 2004
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, seth vidal wrote:
> > That doesn't really follow, though. There are many applications in Core
> > which are there because they facilitate integration of Fedora into
> > environments with legacy OSes -- rdesktop, samba, etc. AV's just another one
> > such app.
> >
>
> rdesktop you can use with vnc on ANY platform.
No. rdesktop does RDP so you can access Windows Terminal Server, XP, etc.
It's a Linux equivalent to Citrix. It has nothing to do with vnc, or with
anything other than allowing Linux to function as a client of Windows
> Samba has been in there for a long time.
And? It's still useful for Linux to interoperate, and the tools needed for
that are still good to include.
> AV depends on access to commercial virus definitions iirc. I'd say that's
> a good reason not to include it.
No it doesn't. You're arguing awfully hard against something you haven't
even looked at....
> And hell, there are N web browsers in FC1 does that mean we should add N
> more?
> No.
That's a different argument. There are no AV scanners in FC1.
later,
chris
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list