pine RPM and IPv6 for imapd
Antonio Querubin
tony at lava.net
Wed Jan 7 01:04:15 UTC 2004
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> doubt you do either. But you know...i bet this license has come up for
> OSI consideration in the past, and there is probably discussion archived
> on the OSI relevant mailinglists that you can research if you care
> enough to want to understand.
Found a whole thread on this and now my head hurts. I guess the bottom
line is figuring out what's really acceptable for Fedora inclusion. I'm
beginning to like the FreeBSD ports system better.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list