RPM submission procedure

[Charles R. Anderson]

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:14:24AM -0500, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> And I personally think if the new Fedora Extras process
> doesn't continue to make transparent QA a priority...and doesn't
> continue to demand community involvement as part of the packaging
> process, but instead allows 'trusted' packagers to do whatever they want
> without peer review....the overall Fedora effort will be losing a very
> good process for educating and mentoring NEW community members who want
> to get involved with packaging. A community process NEEDS to be as much
> about educating and mentoring NEW community members so they can continue
> on with the work..as it is producing a work at all.

Very well said.  I agree 100%.