Patch for Keyspan USB-serial adapter...

Randy Zagar jrzagar at cactus.org
Thu Jan 22 22:32:32 UTC 2004


I'm not sure if you mean the latest 2.4 kernel from kernel.org, or the
latest Fedora Core/1 kernel...  The patch I've posted/forwarded is NEWER
than the one in Fedora's 2.4.22-1.2149.nptl kernel.

Keyspans' latest patch includes changes made in Sep. 2003...

-RZ

On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 15:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:24:30PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:39:10 -0600
> > Randy Zagar <jrzagar at cactus.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > The attached patch files include changes to the kernel-2.4.spec file and
> > > a patch file from the vendor:
> > > 
> > >     http://www.keyspan.com/support/linux/files/currentversion/patch/
> > 
> > I always turn such things down unless there's an overriding reason to
> > include them. Every patch, no matter how correct or benign, adds maintenance
> > burden. IMHO, it is even more justified in case of Fedora, because of
> > Fedora's short release cycle.
> > 
> > The correct way to handle this patch is
> >  1) to identify a champion for the issue. Sometimes it's a user, but
> >     often a vendor. If Keyspan cannot be arsed to
> >     perform the rest of the steps, users have to step in.
> >  2) to file upstream, in this case linux-usb-devel
> 
> I'm pretty sure this change is already in the latest 2.4 kernel.  Randy,
> can you verify this?
> 
> If not, I really need to know.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
-- 
Randy Zagar <jrzagar at cactus.org>
Capital Area Central Texas Unix Society
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040122/7e76d1b7/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list