Updating RPMs using binary deltas (demo)

[Nils Philippsen]

Hi Leonhard,

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 12:43, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > For those folks that want to eventually have optional RPM diffs for 
> > upgrades, please do not continue the discussion here.
> 
> This is the Fedora devel list, right? Maybe more on topic on the RPM
> list, but still a development issue, so IMHO rather on topic in this
> forum.
> 
> I haven't fe seen people talking about kernel issues being referred to
> kernel.org, because their discussions would be more on topic there. If
> you are not interested in the issue don't read the threads.

While this is a development issue, an RPM diffing tool is in no way
Fedora specific (I hope). Kernel related discussion here seems (to me)
concentrated on kernel-on-FC or FC-kernels, luckily we don't have the
huge mess that is called lkml here. I think an RPM diffing tool would be
most on-topic on rpm-list (out of the pool of existing mailing lists),
what'd be on-topic here would be (when it's ready) discussing eventual
inclusion in FC, whether or not it should be used for distribution of FC
packages, etc...

IMO,
Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040127/4b2a181f/attachment.sig>