Apache licensing clash ?
Alan Cox
alan at redhat.com
Thu Jan 29 11:43:58 UTC 2004
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:43:18PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> file). For example, the db4, pcre, and gdbm libraries all list "GPL" as
> the license, yet Apache is linked against them. I though that db4 was a
> under a BSDish license, not the GPL. The pcre license seems to be
db4 is BSDish correct, as is pcre.
> all documentation actually) is omitted from the RPMs; I only found it in
> the source. The gdbm library does appear to be under the GPL however.
That may be an error in this case.
> What makes MySQL different than these? If the MySQL client library
> being under the GPL is a problem for Apache (for example), then so is
> the gdbm library (and potentially others) that are currently being
> linked with Apache.
The gdbm link with apache seems to be problematic yes unless there was
special permission given.
Mark ?
Alan
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list