Package requests wishlist - pine
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Wed Jul 14 14:43:28 UTC 2004
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:09:19 -0500, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> I
> believe its vital to have the option to patch at the packaging level,
> when its deemed appropriate.
...
> the argument is about who has the power to choose when to patch.
And I agree with you in general, that the "power to patch" is a good
thing.
And I know pine's license pretty much sucks.
However, I have yet to see any (official) Fedora policy that "the power
to patch" or "having a non-sucky license" is required for inclusion in
Extras.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list