linux registry (no, not that again!)
W. Michael Petullo
mike at flyn.org
Wed Jul 28 15:39:28 UTC 2004
[...]
>> Yeah why do people want to move to a single config database anyways? So
>> you can have a single point of failure for an entire server and all
>> services? Or so one poorly written app can corrupt it all? Ya know I
>> agree with you guys here.
[...]
> A libconfig (or something) that exports a standard API that programs use
> to look up configuration values. It writes PLAIN TEXT configuration
> files to somewhere in /etc in a consistent format across all
> applications that use it.
>
> Most things store config files in /etc right now, so in the _current_
> situation, if your /etc/ takes a dive, you're hosed. I fail to see how
> a config situation as described in the above paragraph would be _worse_
> than what exists now.
>
> The point of a good converged config project (IMHO) would be a
> _consistent_ _file_ _format_ in plain-text files, NOT a binary-only
> single-file registry. People simply don't seem to understand that.
And consistency should bring /less/ failures because the total amount of
configuration reading code would be greatly reduced.
--
Mike
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list