nominate for removal: logwatch ?
Jason L Tibbitts III
tibbs at math.uh.edu
Thu Jul 8 15:57:04 UTC 2004
>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net> writes:
NM> BTW, did the noises on the list some (long) time ago about
NM> replacing logwatch with a more powerful alsternative ever came to
NM> fruition ?
Either that or just making the defaults a bit more reasonable. Not
sending disk information unless the disks are full, not warning about
failed automount requests, etc. The latter is easily abusable; say
/home is automounted. Then
for i in {0000..9999}; do ls /home/$i; done
spams the administrator with a 10K line logwatch mail. Perhaps I
should bugzilla that one.
- J<
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list