-doc subpackage Group tag

Michael Favia garbage at insitesinc.com
Sat Jul 17 19:39:10 UTC 2004


Ville Skyttä wrote:

>On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 19:19, Steven Pritchard wrote:
>
>  
>
>>So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be
>>renamed to *-docs)?
>>    
>>
>
>FC3test1:      10 * -doc,   5 * -docs,   1 * -manual.
>fedora.us:      2 * -doc,   2 * -docs,   0 * -manual.
>rpmseek.com: 1204 * -doc, 129 * -docs, 141 * -manual (mostly JPackage)
>
>Dunno about renaming, but based on the above, -doc could at least be a
>recommendation for new packages (but then again, IMVHO -docs "sounds"
>better ;).
>  
>
I ran into this same issue in naming database fileds in tables and 
variables in my programming. I decided that the singular form is the 
preferred way to go. Because i was normally refering to a single 
instance of whatever the item was. In this case i believe the same rules 
apply. The package really contains the "documentation" not the 
"documentations". It seems silly but it makes sense for me and i have 
never had to wonder or check if my variable was "apple" or "apples".
--
Michael Favia
Insites Incorporated





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list