Any consensus on a groupware suite for FC/RHEL?

Harald Hoyer harald at redhat.com
Thu Jul 22 15:50:45 UTC 2004


Peter Backlund wrote:
> On tor, 2004-07-22 at 10:58 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 07:32, Jos Vos wrote:
>>
>>>Is there any sight on a choice of a "preferred groupware suite" to
>>>be included in future releases of FC/RHEL, like OpenGroupware.org
>>>or one of the other groupware projects?
>>>
>>
>>We don't have a lot of Red Hat internal motion toward hacking on these
>>right now, mostly because it doesn't look like any of these packages are
>>mature/scalable enough for enterprise customers without a lot of work.
>>
>>There was some discussion on the lists (fedora-desktop maybe) a while
>>back comparing the various options.
>>
>>However, this doesn't mean that the Fedora Project can't include one of
>>these projects. If someone starts on packaging for Fedora Extras now
>>then once we get external cvs etc. (any time now) we could move one of
>>them to Fedora Core I imagine, if there's consensus, etc.
> 
> 
> Harald Hoyer has been packaging OpenGroupware.org for quite a while:
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/harald/ogo/
> 
> Perhaps that could serve as a base for FE package(s)? 
> 
> /Peter
> 
These are old.... use these:
ftp://ftp.opengroupware.org/packages/srpm/





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list